# Cuadra v. George Brown Sports Club-Palm, Inc.

> District Court, E.D. California · May 11, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10019057

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** May 11, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10019057

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 ) Case No. 1:17-CV-01063 DAD EPG
MARIO CUADRA, )
11 ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
12 )
v. ) (ECF No. 136)
13 )
GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB- )
14 PALM, INC.; GEORGE BROWN SPORTS )
CLUB, INC; JOHNSTON )
15 CONTRACTING, INC.; and DOES 1 )
THROUGH 100, )
16 )
Defendants. )
17 )
)
18 )
)
19 )
)
20 AND RELATED THIRD-PARTY )
ACTIONS. )

21

22 The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
23 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed
24 by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims
25 stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs.
26 //
27 //
28 //
1 Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Steven S. Dias
STEVEN S. DIAS
2 Attorney for Plaintiff, Mario Cuadra

3

4
Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Anthony N. DeMaria
5 ANTHONY N. DeMARIA
Attorney for Defendants, Third Party
6 Plaintiff, Cross-Claim Plaintiff, GEORGE
BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC,
7 et al.

8

9
Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ T. Patrick Long
10 T. PATRICK LONG or
WARREN B. CAMPBELL
11
Attorney for Defendant/Cross
12 Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,
JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC.
13

14
Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Kathleen C. Miller
15
PATRICK K. O’BRIEN or
16 KATHLEEN C. MILLER or
BATKHAND ZOLJARGAL
17 Attorney for Third Party
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/
18
KENNETH GLEN CLARK dba CLARK
19 INSTALLATION.

20
Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Alice Chen Smith
21 ALICE CHEN SMITH
Attorney for Third Party Plaintiff/ Third
22
Party Defendant Defendant/Cross
23 Defendant, WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC,
INC.
24
25
26
27
28
4:68 UV VEAL SOM PO ee OY VI

1 ORDER
2 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No.
3 136). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed.
4 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
5 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
6 | ITIS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _ May 8, 2020 [Jee ey ——
8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10019057. Public record. Not legal advice.