# Brown v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

> District Court, E.D. California · February 21, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10017180

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** February 21, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10017180

## Opinion text

1 JOSHUA S. GOODMAN, ESQUIRE - State Bar #116576
ZACHARY S. TOLSON, ESQUIRE - State Bar #242824
2 GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP
417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 705-0400
4 Facsimile: (415) 705-0411
Attorneys for Defendant
5 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.)
***********************************************
6 MATTHEW ROSTON, ESQ. - State Bar #265944
ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC
7 9454 Wilshire Blvd., Ste 850
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
8 Telephone: (310) 550-6221
Facsimile: (310) 246-0305
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY BROWN
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 TIMOTHY BROWN, Case No. 19-cv-00896-DAD-JLT

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
14 vs. (Doc. 19)

15 THE HOME DEPOT, INC.,

16 Defendant.

17
18 Plaintiff TIMOTHY BROWN and Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (erroneously
19 sued as THE HOME DEPOT, INC.) do hereby submit this Stipulated Request for Dismissal
20 pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have settled the matter and all terms of the
21 settlement have been agreed upon and performed. This dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims are with
22 prejudice. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
23 DATED: February 20, 2020 GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP

24 By: /s/ Zachary S. Tolson
ZACHARY S. TOLSON
25 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

G No eo ud mm aa nn 26 DATED: February 20, 2020 ROSTON LAW GROUP, APC
Hamilton LLP
417 M 1o 0tn h t Fgo lom oe r ry St. 27 By: /s/ Matthew Roston
San Francisco, CA
94104 MATTHEW ROSTON
Tel.: (415) 705-0400
1 ORDER
2 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with
3 prejudice. (Doc. 19) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations
4 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688,
5 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7

8 Dated: February 20, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
G No eo ud mm aa nn 26
Hamilton LLP
417 M 1o 0tn h t Fgo lom oe r ry St. 27
San Francisco, CA
94104
Tel.: (415) 705-0400

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10017180. Public record. Not legal advice.