# (SS) Munoz Ferrer v. Commissioner of Social Security

> District Court, E.D. California · January 23, 2020

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10016490

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** January 23, 2020
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10016490

## Opinion text

McGREGOR W. SCOTT
1
United States Attorney
2 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
3 Social Security Administration
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA, CSBN 223600
4
Special Assistant United States Attorney
5 160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
6 Telephone: (415) 977-8929
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
7
E-Mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
FRESNO DIVISION
12

13 ISRAEL MUNOZ FERRER, ) Case No. 1:18-cv-00494-GSA
14 ) )
Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
15 ) AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
vs.
) ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
16 ) THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ANDREW SAUL, )
17 Commissioner of Social Security, ) ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
)
18 )
Defendant. )
19

20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned
21
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the
22
amount of SIX THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED, FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS
23
($6,715.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount
24
represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
25
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).
26
///
27
28 ///
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
2 the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Kelsey Brown, Mackenzie Legal,
3 PLLC. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the
4 assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United
5 States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered,
6 the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
7 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
8 that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to
9 be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments
10 made shall be delivered to counsel.
11 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
12 attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the
13 EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and
14 bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel Kelsey Brown, including Mackenzie
15 Legal, PLLC, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
16 ///
17 ///
18 ///
19 ///
20 ///
21 ///
22 ///
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
1 This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel to seek Social Security Act
2 attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
3 Respectfully submitted,
4
Dated: January 22, 2020 MACKENZIE LEGAL, PLLC
5

6
By: /s/ Kelsey Mackenzie Brown*
7 KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8 [*As authorized by e-mail on Jan. 22, 2020]

9

10 Dated: January 23, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
11 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
12
Social Security Administration
13

14 By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA
15
Special Assistant United States Attorney
16 Attorneys for Defendant
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20 Dated: January 23, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10016490. Public record. Not legal advice.