# (PC) Harris v. Brown

> District Court, E.D. California · August 21, 2019

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10013395

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, E.D. California
- **Decided:** August 21, 2019
- **Opinion:** 100trialcourt
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10013395

## Opinion text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DARREN HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-1406 KJN P
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 JERRY BROWN, et al.,
15 Defendants.
16
17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel.1 Plaintiff’s complaint was filed
18 with the court on July 24, 2019. The court’s own records reveal that on May 16, 2019, plaintiff
19 filed a complaint containing virtually identical allegations. (Harris v. Jerry Brown, No. 2:19-cv-
20 0311 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal.).2 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will
21 recommend that the complaint be dismissed.
22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign
23 a district judge to this case; and
24 ////

25 1 Plaintiff added the names of other inmates to the caption of his complaint, but none of the other
inmates signed the pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Also, plaintiff proceeds pro se and may not file
26
claims on behalf of other individuals. Thus, this action proceeds solely as to plaintiff Harris.
27
2 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d
28 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).
1 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.
2 | P.41b).
3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the District Judge assigned to this
4 | case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served
5 | with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court.
6 | The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
7 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
8 || may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
9 | Cir. 1991).
10 | Dated: August 21, 2019
Arse A Abar
12 KENDALL J. NE
Jharr1 406.23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/10013395. Public record. Not legal advice.