# Brown v. Kentec, Incorporated

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 1, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1001003

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 1, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1001003

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2499

JAMES F. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENTEC, INCORPORATED (CCW); LES PETERS, indi-
vidually; PAM DAUGHERTY, individually,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-166-4-H)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James F. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert Seesholtz Falk, Jr.,
William Francis Patterson, Jr., TURNER, ENOCHS & LLOYD, P.A.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

James F. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of The Civil

Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Kentec, Incor-

porated, No. CA-98-166-4-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1001003. Public record. Not legal advice.