# Brown v. Spartanburg Cnty Det

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 28, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000712

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 28, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000712

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7222

JOHN P. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; LARRY
W. POWERS, Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-3151-3-6-BC)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOL-
COMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

John P. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying re-

lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Brown v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility, No. CA-98-3151-3-6-

BC (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000712. Public record. Not legal advice.