# Brown v. Miro

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 24, 1999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000313

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 24, 1999
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000313

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7178

CURTIS J. BROWN, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correc-
tional Institution; RICHARD MCCANTS, Associate
Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution;
SAMUEL CAUSEY, Mail Supervisor; J. DELOACH,
Captain; ANN PERNELL; KEN LONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-98-2315-2-18AJ)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis J. Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones,
BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Curtis J. Brown, Sr., appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-

ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Brown v. Miro, No. CA-98-2315-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug.

13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000313. Public record. Not legal advice.