# Salanik v. Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 26, 1999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000126

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 26, 1999
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000126

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1886

STEPHEN M. SALANIK, a minor; JUNE A. SALANIK,
mother,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY;
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; ANNE ARUN-
DEL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge.
(CA-99-1348-S)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

June A. Salanik, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Stephen and June Salanik appeal the district court’s orders

dismissing their complaint against Defendants for lack of subject-

matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) and

denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Salanik v. Board of Education, No. CA-99-1348-S (D. Md.

May 24 & June 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/1000126. Public record. Not legal advice.